← Search

Leanna Cempre

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Worthington, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 36W–51L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history87 matches
L
2025-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Gibbs
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-5
W
2025-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda McBride
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-05-15 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Miller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-04-09 · Olympic 1 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Wiese
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-02 · Olympic 1 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Ruoff
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-4, 1-0
L
2025-02-27 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-27 · Olympic 1 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Caton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-13 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maria Ellis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-01-30 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 2-4, 0-1
L
2025-01-08 · Olympic 1 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Roose
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-12-11 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Jarrett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-10-23 · Olympic 1 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Jarrett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
52.4%
11W–10L · 47.8% of games
7.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 33.7% of games
8.0
38.9%
21W–33L · 46.4% of games
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
45%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams