← Search

Virginia Freidman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Salinas, CA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 10W–23L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history33 matches
L
2024-04-09 · CHAMISAL TC 65AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Isabel Rodriguez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-04-02 · CHAMISAL TC 65AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Isabel Rodriguez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2024-03-15 · CHAMISAL TC 65AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gail English
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2023-11-01 · CHAMISAL TC S70W8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Phillipson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2023-10-24 · CHAMISAL TC S70W8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Avedian
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
L
2023-10-18 · CHAMISAL TC S70W8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Priscilla Henry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
L
2023-10-03 · CHAMISAL TC S70W8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diana Wheeler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 5-7
L
2023-09-26 · CHAMISAL TC S70W8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Camilla Sutherland
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-09-05 · CHAMISAL TC S70W8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Avedian
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-01-19 · CHAMISAL TC 65AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Phillipson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2022-01-12 · CHAMISAL TC 65AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Scholink
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2021-07-31 · PASADERA 40AW3.5A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rose Corey
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 59.3% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.7% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 39% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 49.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
42%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova