← Search

Camilla Sutherland

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fresno, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 69W–55L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history124 matches
W
2026-10-30 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK S70W8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terry Babcock
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-10-01 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK S70W8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandra Miller
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-21 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK S70W8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hilda Fischer
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-08 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK S70W8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandra Miller
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-13 · CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS 55AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Heck
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-02 · SIERRA SPORT 55AW9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joan Avedian
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-02 · SIERRA SPORT 55AW9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joan Avedian
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-28 · CLOVIS TC/BUCHANAN HS 55AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Heck
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-28 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 40AW4.5A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joan Avedian
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-25 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 40AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Candace Egan
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-02-15 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK 40AW4.5A · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Joan Avedian
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-10-20 · ROEDING PK TENNIS CL/ROEDING PK S70W8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandra Miller
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 57.9% of games
4.5
52.1%
25W–23L · 50.4% of games
8.0
65.6%
21W–11L · 54.7% of games
8.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 42.1% of games
9.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 35.7% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
31 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert