← Search

Kathleen Chassion

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Salinas, CA
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 23W–9L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history32 matches
L
2026-07-11 · CHAMISAL TC 55AW9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lynn Holt championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-10 · CHAMISAL TC 55AW9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lynn Holt championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · CHAMISAL TC 55AW9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lynn Holt
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-03 · CHAMISAL TC 55AW9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lynn Holt
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · CHAMISAL TC 55AW9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lynn Holt
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-04-26 · MISSION RANCH 55AW9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Suzanne Andrews
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-04-19 · MISSION RANCH 55AW9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lynne Johnson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-04-06 · MISSION RANCH 55AW9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Laura Ravalin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-03-22 · MISSION RANCH 55AW9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Monica Rua
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
L
2024-03-17 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.5A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brenda Berke
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-03-16 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.5A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrea Bohn Eisinger
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-4
W
2024-03-03 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.5A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrea Bohn Eisinger
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
70%
14W–6L · 55.6% of games
9.0
75%
9W–3L · 62.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
20 matches
#1 Singles
22%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams