← Search

Andrea Bohn Eisinger

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Carmel Valley, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 32W–11L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history43 matches
W
2026-05-02 · CHAMISAL TC 55AW9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gena Sagin
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-05-02 · CHAMISAL TC 55AW9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gena Sagin
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-21 · CARMEL V RANCH 40AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gena Sagin
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-14 · CARMEL V RANCH 40AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lynne Johnson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-01-25 · CARMEL V RANCH 40AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathrin Brown
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-17 · CARMEL V RANCH 40AW4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Lyssy Haase
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-05-17 · MISSION RANCH 55AW9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Suzanne Andrews
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-04-26 · MISSION RANCH 55AW9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lauren Lyssy Haase
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-05-18 · CARMEL V RANCH 55AW9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lauren Lyssy Haase
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-03-16 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.5A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathleen Chassion
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-4
W
2024-03-03 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.5A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathleen Chassion
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-02-25 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.5A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathleen Chassion
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
72%
18W–7L · 57.6% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 59.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal