← Search

Roxanne Stephenson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fresno, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 28W–30L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history58 matches
L
2026-10-30 · CLOVIS TC/COPPER RIVER CC S70W8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sue Williams
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-21 · CLOVIS TC/COPPER RIVER CC S70W8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Gorman
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-09-08 · CLOVIS TC/COPPER RIVER CC S70W8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Gorman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-09 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Ellis
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-29 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 55AW8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rosa Amaro
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-25 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terry Babcock
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-09 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leanne Monreal
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-30 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rosa Amaro
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-25 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 55AW8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anne Ellis
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-14 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 40AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Diedrich
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-01 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 40AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Mirzayan
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-31 · CLOVIS TC/CLOVIS NORTH HS 40AW4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Mirzayan
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
50%
11W–11L · 52.1% of games
8.0
35%
7W–13L · 46.8% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova