← Search

Polly Rothberg

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Boulder, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 34W–36L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history70 matches
L
2025-06-11 · BTA-IBM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Gerra
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-06-04 · BTA-IBM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Mueh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-05-21 · BTA-IBM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pat Burgener
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-05-11 · BTA-IBM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruth Henderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-30 · BTA-IBM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lyne Cahn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
W
2024-08-07 · BTA-IBM PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Samantha McBride
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
W
2024-07-28 · BTA-IBM PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Lowenstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-07-24 · BTA-IBM PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Lowenstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
W
2024-07-17 · BTA-IBM PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pat Burgener
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-07-03 · BTA-IBM PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Samantha McBride
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-5
W
2024-06-26 · BTA-IBM PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Lowenstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-06-12 · BTA-IBM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Webber
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 53.1% of games
7.0
46.6%
27W–31L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova