← Search

Pam Decker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Westminster, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 28W–24L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history52 matches
W
2026-07-02 · MEA TEAL · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Saperstein
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-25 · MEA TEAL · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristen Royer
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-09-10 · MEA PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Saperstein championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-07-24 · MEA PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Saperstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-07-17 · MEA PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Saperstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-07-03 · MEA PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Saperstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-08-07 · MEA NAVY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Saperstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
L
2024-07-31 · MEA NAVY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Saperstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-07-10 · MEA NAVY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Saperstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
Laura Studebaker / Susan Cooper
2024-06-13 · BRMST GREEN · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sharla Prom
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-05-09 · BRMST GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Saperstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-05-02 · BRMST GREEN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Beth Saperstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
43.3%
13W–17L · 49.5% of games
6.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 57% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe