← Search

Mary McFadyen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 59W–64L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history123 matches
W
2025-09-11 · CACM PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lise Uhrich championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-11 · CACM PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lise Uhrich championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-7
L
2025-09-10 · CACM PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lise Uhrich championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-6
W
2025-07-31 · CACM PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lise Uhrich
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-07-17 · CACM PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lise Uhrich
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-07-10 · CACM PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lise Uhrich
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-07-03 · CACM PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lise Uhrich
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
W
2025-06-26 · CACM PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anne Beletic
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-07-31 · CACM ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lise Uhrich
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2024-07-10 · CACM ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lise Uhrich
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-26 · CACM ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lise Uhrich
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-04-13 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bobbie Turner
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 51.4% of games
3.0
61.8%
34W–21L · 55.5% of games
3.5
10%
1W–9L · 33.9% of games
6.0
60%
12W–8L · 53.7% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
23.5%
4W–13L · 40.7% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.6% of games
6.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer