← Search

Christopher Combs

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Paul, MN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 41W–29L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history70 matches
W
2026-02-04 · Farrell/Birch - Winter 2026 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Quinn Combs
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-06-19 · Northern/Cychosz/55&Over9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gary Aasen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-6
W
2025-05-29 · Northern/Cychosz/55&Over9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Paul Schroeder
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-05-22 · Northern/Cychosz/55&Over9.0M · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Paul Schroeder
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-07-25 · Cychosz · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christopher Gustilo
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-07-18 · Cychosz · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christopher Gustilo
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-06-13 · Cychosz · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Duffey
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2024-03-13 · Combs and Associates · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Quinn Combs
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2024-03-06 · Combs and Associates · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brady Combs
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2024-02-21 · Combs and Associates · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cullen Combs
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-02-14 · Combs and Associates · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trace Combs
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2024-02-07 · Combs and Associates · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tucker Combs
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
58.1%
25W–18L · 55.6% of games
5.0
25%
2W–6L · 44.6% of games
9.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 61.7% of games
9.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
40%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer