← Search

Darren Hom

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Jose, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
309 matches · 202W–107L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history309 matches
W
2026-10-05 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 55MX8.0B · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diane Hudson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-09-22 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 55MX8.0B · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Cleveland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-11 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deana Dyal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-06 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anh-Vi Dao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-20 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 55AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Cirata
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-17 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM4.0B · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lawrence Roseman
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 55AM8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Nakamura
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM4.0B · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Hall
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-02 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 55AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Afendakis
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-19 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM4.0B · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bo Kim
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-09 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Cerbasi championship
loading the estimate
3-3
W
2026-04-05 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rajeev Prasad championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams87 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
100%
25W–0L · 70.5% of games
4.0
64.8%
57W–31L · 54.6% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 61.9% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 33.3% of games
7.5
47.6%
10W–11L · 49% of games
8.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 57% of games
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 50.5% of games
6.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 70.1% of games
7.0mixed
72.2%
39W–15L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
54.1%
33W–28L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
95 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
86 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
85 matches
#1 Singles
7%
21 matches
Singles
6%
17 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal