Search

Todd Cirata

Saratoga, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
219 matches · 112W–107L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.11
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 34 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
8%
stay 3.0
92%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 49% stay · 51% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.00. Lower than today’s 3.11 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Teams51 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Todd has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Todd has gone from the 17th to the 50th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.0
44.3%
27W–34L · 49.4% of games
3.5
35.5%
11W–20L · 44.1% of games
6.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 60.1% of games
6.5
68.2%
15W–7L · 54.5% of games
7.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 44.7% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
57.1%
24W–18L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history219 matches
L
Joe Menkhaus / Luciana Bertholdmixed
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vonda Reid
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Eric Engstrom / Peter Sanchezchamps
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Joe Liebeschuetz
+0.036better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Kristen Pisani / Mark Abatemixed
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kei Worry
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Jeff Lee / Chao Yang
2026-06-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Afendakis
+0.012better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Rahul Sharma / Vishal Singh
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael McGrain
+0.059better than expected — took 63% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Bryan Richter / Walter Ghijsen
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darren Hom
0.040below expectation — took 32% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Robert Hadowanetz / Sachin Shahchamps
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · with Michael Afendakis
0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Harinath Chidipotu / Ananth Manjaprachamps
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · with Michael Afendakis
+0.064better than expected — took 86% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
David Taylor / Gary Serbent
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with LEM LLOYD
0.047below expectation — took 29% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Andrew Neff / Phil Medina
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sargon Isaac
+0.018better than expected — took 60% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Terence T Park / Chandra Cheruku
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Afendakis
0.052below expectation — took 39% of games against 61% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Joe Menkhaus / David Taylor
2026-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robert Blake
0.081below expectation — took 14% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.