← Search

Darlene Sparks

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tampa, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 34W–52L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history86 matches
L
2026-07-26 · Tampa Palms 7.5 Combo 2026/Bouchard · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Sakre
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · Tampa Palms 7.5 Combo 2026/Bouchard · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Fan Wang
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Bastian championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-01 · TampaPalms/SunsetNinjas/ M. Suksai · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Schnieders
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-26 · Flight Winner/Tampa Palms/M. Suksai · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Schnieders
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-05-18 · TampaPalms/SunsetNinjas/ M. Suksai · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Kintzle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-04 · TampaPalms/SunsetNinjas/ M. Suksai · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Kintzle
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-01 · Flight Winner/Tampa Palms/M. Suksai · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Bialousz
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-27 · TampaPalms/SunsetNinjas/ M. Suksai · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matura Suksai
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
N/A
2026-04-10 · Flight Winner/Tampa Palms/M. Suksai · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn O'Brien
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-30 · Arbor Greene 4.0 LOVAS - C. Paul · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caralyn Paul
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · Arbor Greene 4.0 LOVAS - C. Paul · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janelle Hanson
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
41%
25W–36L · 48.7% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 39.7% of games
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.8% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 45.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 33.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
21 matches
#2 Singles
9%
8 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova