← Search

Mike Jones

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CHASKA, MN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
203 matches · 132W–71L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history203 matches
L
2026-10-05 · Henneman ES27 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edwin Freeman
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-29 · Peschel ES2026 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Doug MacGibbon championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-28 · Peschel ES2026 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Siegel championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-22 · Henneman 2026 65+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edwin Freeman
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · 65+ 9.0 Acc. Team · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Craig Ballentine
loading the estimate
2-6
L
2026-07-08 · 65+ 9.0 Acc. Team · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Edwin Freeman
loading the estimate
2-6
W
2026-06-24 · Henneman 2026 65+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edwin Freeman
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-20 · Henneman 2026 65+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Craig Ballentine
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-21 · Lopez James · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Blake Gall
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-03-05 · Lopez James · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael James
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
David Schlosser / James Werst
2026-02-14 · Northern/Henneman/65&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edwin Freeman championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Terry Hazell / George Padgett
2026-02-14 · Northern/Henneman/65&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edwin Freeman championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
78%
46W–13L · 61.3% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 48.6% of games
8.0
59.7%
77W–52L · 54.5% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
94 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
41 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams