← Search

Robert Jensen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Paul, MN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 59W–71L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history130 matches
L
2026-07-01 · Peschel S2026 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Norlander
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-10 · Peschel S2026 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gordon Strom
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-20 · Peschel S2026 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Moe
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-06 · Peschel S2026 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Noren
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-06-17 · Magistad: On the Rise · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Sandor
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-27 · Magistad: On the Rise · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lee Jones
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-06 · Magistad: On the Rise · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony Magistad
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-07-15 · Wittnebel/Sulzbach · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Baumel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
2024-07-08 · Wittnebel/Sulzbach · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Sulzbach
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-07-01 · Wittnebel/Sulzbach · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ted Stearns
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-7
L
2024-06-24 · Wittnebel/Sulzbach · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Sulzbach
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-10 · Wittnebel/Sulzbach · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Baumel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.9% of games
4.0
46.7%
21W–24L · 48.4% of games
7.0
67.9%
19W–9L · 55.8% of games
8.0
32.1%
17W–36L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
40 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal