← Search

James Rider

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Austin, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 21W–34L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history55 matches
L
2026-06-20 · Over 65 Gone to Whitaker · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Omar Garcia
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · Over 65 Gone to Whitaker · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Omar Garcia
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-06 · Over 65 Gone to Whitaker · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Senich
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-30 · Over 65 Gone to Whitaker · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lewis Price
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-09 · Over 65 Gone to Whitaker · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Thurber
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-18 · Over 65 Gone to Whitaker · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Nazarenus
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Fred Wahlers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Christensen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Larry Eichenbaum
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Larry Eichenbaum
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Thurber
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-06-08 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Fred Wahlers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
43.2%
19W–25L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
17 matches
Singles
20%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert