← Search

Kimm Ketelsen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hutto, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 14W–14L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history28 matches
W
2026-06-20 · Courtyard Crushers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Swenson
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · Courtyard Crushers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bob Harris
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-06 · Courtyard Crushers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Clevlen
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-05 · Courtyard Crushers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Swenson
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · Courtyard Crushers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Swenson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-16 · Courtyard Crushers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Hobbs
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-05-09 · Courtyard Crushers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Clevlen
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-21 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Burns
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Mims
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Burns
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-1
L
2025-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Hobbs
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
48.1%
13W–14L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 54% of the time
#2 Doubles
54%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
4 matches
Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova