← Search

Howard Fretter

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bloomfield, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
8 matches · 1W–7L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history8 matches
L
2025-08-05 · 4WESS-STOCKER 70M TU 55&O SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Stocker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-29 · 4WESS-STOCKER 70M TU 55&O SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Stocker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-07-22 · 4WESS-STOCKER 70M TU 55&O SEM F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Stocker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-01 · 4WESS-STOCKER 70M TU 55&O SEM F2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Rich
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-24 · 4WESS-STOCKER 70M TU 55&O SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Stocker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-06-10 · 4WESS-STOCKER 70M TU 55&O SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Stocker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2019-07-16 · 1BOH-GORDON 40MEN 18 TUES SEM F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Gates
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2019-06-18 · 1BOH-GORDON 40MEN 18 TUES SEM F1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Gates
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 37.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova