David Rich
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sterling Heights, MI
54 matches · 22W–32L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history54 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-7
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2025
4WESS-STOCKER 70M TU 55&O SEM F2
2LIFE-ARIMA AD40&O MO 35 MEN SEM F2
5PEACH-MEESSEMAN 40M 40&O AD THURS SEM F2
5TROY-LI 7.0 mix 40&O SEM f3
6TROY-LI 7.0 18&O MIXED SEM F3
3TROY-HICKS 7.0 18&O MIXED SEM F4
4TROY-LI 70mix 18 sem F1
6PEACH-HOMBREBUENO 75 MEN COMBO SEM F1
6TROY-LI 40&OVER 70MIX F4
PA Kupres FWL A55-8.0M
PA Kupres SSL A55-8.0M
2PEACH-GAINES 8.0 mix 18&O sem f1
2PEACH-GAINES 80 mix 40&O sem f1
2PEACH-MEESSEMAN 40MEN 40 THUR SEM F1
3PEACH-CUPPLES 40msing winwe sem f2
4PEACH-DORSEY 70 mix 40&O sem f1
6PEACH-GAINES 8.0 mix 55 & over sem
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 52.9% of games
4.0
30%
3W–7L · 47.7% of games
7.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 31.7% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.9% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#3 Singles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.