← Search

Patricia Nathan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Miami, FL
2.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 28W–45L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history73 matches
W
Joan Sanz / Vera Simm
2026-05-12 · Coral Reef Park (Picard) · #6 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Gloria Suarez-Sanchez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
Lisa Arizmendy / Barbara Schwartz
2026-05-05 · Coral Reef Park (Picard) · #5 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Weissmann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-24 · Sterling (Neighborhood Tennis) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Weissmann
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · Coral Reef Park (Picard) · #6 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Weissmann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-20 · Sterling (Neighborhood Tennis) · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chie-Mie Chyung
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-01-20 · Coral Reef Park (Picard) · #6 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicky Goldner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
Suzanne Wallach / Joan Sanz
2025-11-18 · Coral Reef Park (Picard) · #6 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Gloria Suarez-Sanchez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-10-17 · Sterling (Neighborhood Tennis) · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chie-Mie Chyung
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-10-07 · Coral Reef Park (Picard) · #5 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Gloria Suarez-Sanchez
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-04 · Coral Reef (Picard) · #6 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosemary McComas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
Celeste Miller / Sylvia Arill
2024-04-23 · Continental - Picard · #5 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Novar
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-04-19 · Sterling (Neighborhood Tennis) · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jean Voglino
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
43.2%
16W–21L · 46.1% of games
3.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 39.7% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.9% of games
6.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
11 matches
#6 Female Doubles
15%
11 matches
#5 Female Doubles
10%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova