← Search

Gloria Suarez-Sanchez

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Coral Gables, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 46W–77L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history123 matches
W
2026-10-30 · Sterling (Neighborhood Tennis) · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Angelica Sintes
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-10-23 · Sterling (Neighborhood Tennis) · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chie-Mie Chyung
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-16 · Sterling (Neighborhood Tennis) · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chie-Mie Chyung
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-02 · Sterling (Neighborhood Tennis) · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Herrera
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-09-18 · Sterling (Neighborhood Tennis) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jackie Kearns
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-15 · Sterling (Neighborhood Tennis) · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jackie Kearns
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-08 · Sterling (Neighborhood Tennis) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Carrero
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
Joan Sanz / Vera Simm
2026-05-12 · Coral Reef Park (Picard) · #6 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Nathan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-28 · Coral Reef Park (Picard) · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with AnaElena Multach
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-1
L
2026-04-24 · Sterling (Neighborhood Tennis) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Angelica Sintes
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-17 · Sterling (Neighborhood Tennis) · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Angelica Sintes
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-10 · Sterling (Neighborhood Tennis) · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Angelica Sintes
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
34.9%
37W–69L · 42% of games
3.5
50%
6W–6L · 48.8% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #4 Doubles, 24% of the time
#4 Doubles
24%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
23 matches
#1 Singles
14%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
8 matches
#6 Female Doubles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer