← Search

Crawford Carpenter

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Danville, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 14W–37L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history51 matches
L
2026-10-15 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Puckett
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-04 · PLEASANTON 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ignatius Chan
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-20 · PLEASANTON 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Freeman
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-09-10 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Pitman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-08-27 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fred Dasalla
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-09 · PLEASANTON 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ronald Lorentz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
W
2024-10-23 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Soto
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-09-25 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Barsky
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-09-09 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Owen Oneil
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-08-20 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ronald Lorentz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-04-12 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Katzman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
W
2024-04-12 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Katzman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 47.4% of games
7.0
30.8%
8W–18L · 37.1% of games
7.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 27.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams