← Search

Gary Soto

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Berkeley, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
232 matches · 133W–99L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history232 matches
L
2026-10-29 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC S70M6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barry Greenwald
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-10-14 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC S70M6.0B · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Fowles
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-10-13 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC S70M6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barry Greenwald
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-10-07 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC S70M6.0B · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Fowles
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-10-06 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC S70M6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barry Greenwald
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-30 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC S70M6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barry Greenwald
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-09-29 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Pitman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-23 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC S70M6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Fowles
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-16 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC S70M6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robert Fowles
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-09-14 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fred Dasalla
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-09-10 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Pitman
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-27 · PLEASANTON S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Pitman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
50%
12W–12L · 47.2% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
65.4%
34W–18L · 55.6% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 51.6% of games
7.0
60.8%
48W–31L · 54.2% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.5% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
15W–12L · 53.3% of games
7.0mixed
59.3%
16W–11L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
83 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
52 matches
Singles
5%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer