← Search

Ted Thiele

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Vallejo, CA
2.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 9W–39L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history48 matches
L
2026-09-30 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS S70M6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alfred Barton
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-23 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS S70M6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Thomas Herman
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-09-09 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS S70M6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ted Arvisu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-08-13 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40MX6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lindsey Levine mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-07-13 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40MX6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Megan Skupny mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-02-22 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 65AM6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ven Alota
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-02-08 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 65AM6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Juan Esquivel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2023-04-12 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 65AM6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Frank Lazzarotto
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
L
2023-04-05 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 65AM6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alvan Bregman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-02-22 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 65AM6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steven Conlon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2022-11-02 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS S70M6.0B · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeff Gold
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2022-10-26 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS S70M6.0B · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marc Levin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 35.3% of games
6.0
20%
6W–24L · 43% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 56% of the time
#3 Doubles
56%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer