Frank Lazzarotto
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sonoma, CA
54 matches · 14W–40L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history54 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2024
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 65AM6.0A
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS S70M6.0A
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 65AM6.0B
GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS S70M6.0B
NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AM6.0A
NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 65AM6.0A
NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 65AM6.0A
NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS S70M6.0A
NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40AM3.0A
NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40MX6.0A
NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55MX6.0A
NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 65AM6.0A
NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18MX6.0A
NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40AM3.0A
NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 40MX6.0A
NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55AM6.0A
NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 55MX6.0A
NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CM6.5A
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
25%
2W–6L · 43.2% of games
6.0
37.5%
12W–20L · 47.4% of games
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 28.4% of games
6.0mixed
0%
0W–10L · 35.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
14 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.