← Search

Craig Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Alamo, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 5W–26L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history31 matches
L
2026-10-28 · LAFAYETTE TC S70M6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rick Silvani
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-30 · LAFAYETTE TC S70M6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Curtis Savoye
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-10 · LAFAYETTE TC S70M6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Edward Shaffer
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · LAFAYETTE TC S70M6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Edward Shaffer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-09 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Obrien
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-02 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Deluce
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-03 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Karas
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-02-26 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jim Karas
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-12 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Deluce
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-29 · LAFAYETTE TC S70M6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Raymond Teeling
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-30 · LAFAYETTE TC S70M6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rick Silvani
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-09-24 · LAFAYETTE TC S70M6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gary Brundage
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
6.0
16.1%
5W–26L · 39.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal