← Search

Edward Shaffer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lafayette, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
200 matches · 56W–144L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history200 matches
L
2026-11-01 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christopher Hanford
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-28 · LAFAYETTE TC S70M6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with B Peter Maspaitella
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-10-15 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Josh Cohen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-10-08 · LAFAYETTE TC S70M6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patrick Farrell
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-30 · LAFAYETTE TC S70M6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Max Sylver
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-15 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Doug van Slyke
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-10 · LAFAYETTE TC S70M6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Craig Smith
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-02 · LAFAYETTE TC S70M6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Craig Smith
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-25 · LAFAYETTE TC S70M6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Royce Paulsen
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jon Kawamoto championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-14 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jon Kawamoto championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-23 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wayne Badorf
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
20.9%
14W–53L · 40.5% of games
6.0
37.1%
39W–66L · 44.6% of games
6.5
12%
3W–22L · 32.4% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
85 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
55 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova