← Search

Patrick Farrell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Walnut Creek, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 21W–77L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history98 matches
L
2026-10-23 · LAFAYETTE TC S70M6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rick Silvani
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-08 · LAFAYETTE TC S70M6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Edward Shaffer
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-22 · LAFAYETTE TC S70M6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Max Sylver
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacques Raymond
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-18 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacques Raymond
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-22 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Todd Sherbondy
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-14 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AM3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Obrien
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-13 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AM3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Karas
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-20 · LAFAYETTE TC 65AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Edward Shaffer
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-08 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AM3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jojo de Lusong
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-02-01 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AM3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Karas
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-01-18 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AM3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nick Trilok
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
15.4%
8W–44L · 36.8% of games
6.0
27.8%
10W–26L · 43.3% of games
6.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.1% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
29 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King