← Search

Tony LaFrance

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lafayette, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 71W–61L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history132 matches
L
2026-10-01 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rudy Haluza
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-15 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nayeem Shah
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-09-02 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Tak
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-11 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Lee championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alan Biocca championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ahmed Nisar championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rick Chan championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AM6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rick Chan championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.0A · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Divya Dixit
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.5B · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Schweller
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-31 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.0A · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
2-2
L
2026-05-31 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.5B · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sam Winer
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
49.3%
35W–36L · 50.4% of games
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 25.9% of games
6.0
65.5%
19W–10L · 58.1% of games
6.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 54.2% of games
7.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
27 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams