← Search

Nathan Schweller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Walnut Creek, CA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 23W–24L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history47 matches
W
2026-10-18 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jimmy Gu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-22 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rich Golinski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-15 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Bockman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-05 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jimmy Gu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-14 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40MX7.0D · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Pruden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40MX7.0D · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Caruso mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40MX7.0D · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Pruden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-10 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40MX7.0D · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Treppa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.5B · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony LaFrance
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-03 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.5B · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AM3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jon Corbett
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-08 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AM3.5A · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
57.7%
15W–11L · 56.4% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 46.6% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.3% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 47% of the time
#1 Singles
47%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova