← Search

John Bockman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pleasant Hill, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
147 matches · 45W–102L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history147 matches
L
2026-10-18 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Daniel Bao
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-15 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nathan Schweller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-30 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Conan Moats
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-20 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jimmy Gu championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM6.0A · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jimmy Gu championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nick Trilok
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nick Trilok
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-22 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rob Kinnard
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-18 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rich Golinski
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-28 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rob Kinnard
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-03-22 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jimmy Gu
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-14 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AM3.0A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Edward Shaffer
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
37%
10W–17L · 44.1% of games
3.5
25%
4W–12L · 42.8% of games
6.0
48.1%
13W–14L · 48.8% of games
6.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.4% of games
7.0
0%
0W–8L · 36.2% of games
6.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 48.3% of games
7.0mixed
22.6%
12W–41L · 37% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
28 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King