← Search

Daniel Bao

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Alameda, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
209 matches · 88W–121L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history209 matches
L
2026-10-18 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Bockman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-11 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rich Golinski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-17 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Gee
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-16 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Januario
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-10 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Morissette
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-30 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Wax
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Wu
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-18 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Russ Iwanchuk
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-29 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Januario
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-20 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 55AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Betts
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-08 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AM3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Miller
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-07 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE 40AM3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Conan Moats
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
43.4%
36W–47L · 47% of games
6.5
37%
10W–17L · 45.7% of games
7.0
51.3%
20W–19L · 49.7% of games
7.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 31.9% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 57.9% of games
7.0mixed
34.1%
15W–29L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
83 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
52 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams