← Search

Christopher Hanford

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Benicia, CA
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
84 matches · 25W–59L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history84 matches
L
2026-11-01 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Edward Shaffer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-28 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nick Trilok
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-10-03 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nick Trilok
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-30 · PLEASANT HILL/PLEASANT HILL MIDDLE CM6.5A · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matthew Pellouchoud
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-09 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 40MX6.0A · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bobbi Jacoby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-07-06 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 40MX6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bobbi Jacoby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-07-02 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 40MX6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Imelda Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-06-22 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 40MX6.0A · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Hill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2025-05-10 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dennis Ciriaco
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-04-12 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Connerley
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2025-04-05 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nic Samonte
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-04-01 · GREATER VALLEJO TA/AMADOR COURTS 55AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dennis Ciriaco
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 48.2% of games
3.5
12.5%
2W–14L · 36.3% of games
6.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 56.3% of games
6.5
11.8%
2W–15L · 33.9% of games
7.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 43.3% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 54.9% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 24.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
24 matches
#1 Singles
19%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams