← Search

Mary Ayala

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Irving, TX
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 10W–8L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history18 matches
W
2024-03-23 · LBH/O'Brien W7.0S · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy Bass
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-5
W
2024-02-24 · LBH/O'Brien W7.0S · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Ngo
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2024-02-17 · LBH/O'Brien W7.0S · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hollee Voisinet
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-01-28 · LBH/O'Brien W7.0S · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Anderson
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-01-27 · LBH/O'Brien W7.0S · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Belknap
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-12-10 · Fire & Ice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christie Madali
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-12-09 · Fire & Ice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Ayala-Lott
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-12-08 · Fire & Ice · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Ayala-Lott
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2023-02-04 · Greenhill/Chandler W8.0S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kate Poplin Ikeda
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
W
2023-01-28 · Greenhill/Chandler W8.0S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kate Poplin Ikeda
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
W
2023-01-21 · Greenhill/Chandler W8.0S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kate Poplin Ikeda
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
L
2022-03-19 · Greenhill/Chandler W8.0S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kate Poplin Ikeda
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 47.3% of games
8.0
50%
3W–3L · 55.7% of games
8.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 76.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 72% of the time
#1 Doubles
72%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer