← Search

Roshawna Sloan

San Antonio, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
60 matches · 43W–17L · seasons 2019–2021
Where Roshawna sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Roshawna is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Roshawna has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Roshawna has gone from the 83rd to the 87th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 60.7% of games
3.0
81.5%
22W–5L · 63.6% of games
3.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 45.2% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 62.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
W
2021-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Tess Laskaris
+0.055better than expected — took 71% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2021-08-13 · #2 Doubles · with Tess Laskaris
−0.051below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Chutimont Blacksmith / Hong Vochamps
2021-08-13 · #1 Doubles · with Felicity Womer
+0.018about as expected — took 33% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2021-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Tess Laskaris
+0.019better than expected — took 80% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2021-07-09 · #1 Doubles · with Tess Laskaris
−0.028below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Lisa Smith / Karen Jones
2021-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chun Saul
+0.012better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2021-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Gano
+0.002about as expected — took 60% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Bug Ruder / Kristen Fourtner
2021-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Violet Clerget
+0.043better than expected — took 86% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2021-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Violet Clerget
−0.005better than expected — took 86% of games against 75% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2021-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Brazel
+0.008about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2021-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chun Saul
−0.033below expectation — took 63% of games against 71% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2021-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tess Laskaris
+0.033better than expected — took 86% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.