Teams

Sweethearts

2026 40 & OVER WEEKDAY WOMEN · 3.5 W Thursday

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-18vs Fire It UpWon 32
L#1 DoublesKim Lonergan / Melinda Condos vs Natalie Drayton / Kathy Burkholder4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda Sykes vs Amy Hall3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRoshawna Sloan / Patti Ramirez vs Barbara Vance / Donna Kerig6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDaniella Ganser / Anne Seay vs Kerry Napper / Michelle Pettit7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#4 DoublesMonica Saenz-Vigil / Kelly Oberhauser vs Yvonne Uhl / Paula Sachse7-6, 7-5
2026-02-26vs JNCC Acing GracefullyWon 10
W#3 DoublesRoshawna Sloan / Jennifer Jones vs Fiona Payton / Julia Vlahos6-4, 6-2
2026-02-19vs Double ShotsWon 41
W#1 DoublesMonica Saenz-Vigil / Kelly Oberhauser vs Mary Cirilo / Susan Townsend6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDarcy Hoberman vs Patricia Phipps3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesEsmeralda Canales / Patti Ramirez vs Hanh Tran / Marina Henkes6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnne Seay / Abby Holahan vs Leigh Cecil / Bertie Mzyk6-2, 6-2
W#4 DoublesMargaret Chavez / Melinda Condos vs Annette Armstrong / Theresa Holland6-1, 6-0
2026-01-29vs Team Happy HourWon 10
W#2 DoublesRoshawna Sloan / Susie Keylon vs Laura Ogrodnik / Teri Quance6-4, 6-4
2026-01-15vs WinnersLost 01
L#3 DoublesRoshawna Sloan / Anne Seay vs Lori Martin / Jane Spears6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Kim Lonergan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Roshawna Sloan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.48
Patti Ramirez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Monica Saenz-Vigil
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Kelly Oberhauser
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Margaret Chavez
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Ann Cross
published 3.5
3.39
Esmeralda Canales
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Daniella Ganser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Anne Seay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Michiko Callanan
published
3.30
Shawna McCabe
published
3.29
Melinda Condos
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Susie Keylon
published
3.21
Amanda Sykes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Darcy Hoberman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Abby Holahan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ivy Marden
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawna McCabe + Kim Lonergan7163% games+12.8% vs expected
Daniella Ganser + Patti Ramirez7171% games+10.2% vs expected
Shawna McCabe + Melinda Condos3358% games+7.9% vs expected
Kelly Oberhauser + Monica Saenz-Vigil7262% games+3.3% vs expected
Patti Ramirez + Esmeralda Canales13360% games+2.3% vs expected
Kim Lonergan + Melinda Condos9554% games+1.6% vs expected
Abby Holahan + Monica Saenz-Vigil6652% games−1.5% vs expected
Daniella Ganser + Melinda Condos3350% games−2.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Lonergan
33W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Roshawna Sloan
95W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.52
Patti Ramirez
37W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Monica Saenz-Vigil
27W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Kelly Oberhauser
17W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.42
Margaret Chavez
12W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Ann Cross
7W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Esmeralda Canales
21W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Daniella Ganser
22W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Anne Seay
19W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
Michiko Callanan
12W–20L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Shawna McCabe
28W–18L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Melinda Condos
31W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Susie Keylon
16W–22L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Amanda Sykes
18W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Darcy Hoberman
16W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Abby Holahan
20W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.10
Ivy Marden
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.