← Search

Kevin Stutey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Zionsville, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 54W–20L · seasons 2024–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history74 matches
L
2026-10-28 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Dang · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Paul Podgorny
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-13 · Indy A40 4.0M TUE CRC Nelson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Nelson
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-10-09 · Indy CX 7.5 CRC Nelson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angel Dean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-07 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Dang · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Evan Golightly
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-10-02 · Indy CX 7.5 CRC Nelson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angel Dean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-23 · Indy C 8.5M IRCD Dang · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Evan Golightly
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-14 · Indy X18 8.0 CRC Nelson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ruth Gaston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · Indy X18 8.0 CRC Nelson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ruth Gaston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-23 · Indy A18 4.0M CRC Husmann · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rich Lytle
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-30 · Indy A40 4.0M CRC Nelson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Noe
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-25 · Indy A18 4.0M CRC Husmann · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Seale
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-23 · Indy A40 4.0M CRC Nelson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Ferguson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.7% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
74.4%
29W–10L · 58.6% of games
7.5
80%
8W–2L · 60.6% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 57.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
20 matches
#1 Singles
18%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
12 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert