← Search

Lisa Martin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
210 matches · 106W–104L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history210 matches
W
2026-10-20 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Somers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Schroeder
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-10-17 · Indy C 8.5W IRCD Somers · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kourtney Cogdill
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-10-06 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Somers · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-29 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Somers · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-09-22 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Somers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Somers
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-14 · Indy X18 8.0 DCC Martin · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Haas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · Indy X18 8.0 DCC Martin · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Max Baltz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · Indy X18 8.0 DCC Martin · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Max Baltz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-16 · Indy A40 4.0W DCC Somers · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 4.0W DCC Somers · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-07 · Indy A18 4.0W LNHS Ackerman · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-23 · Indy A18 4.0W LNHS Ackerman · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
65.9%
54W–28L · 58.4% of games
7.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 58.3% of games
8.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 44.8% of games
8.0mixed
43.9%
36W–46L · 48.9% of games
8.5mixed
11.8%
2W–15L · 38.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
60 matches
#1 Singles
24%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
46 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert