← Search

Melissa Hehmann

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
220 matches · 162W–58L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history220 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Taeko Escasa
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-20 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Clay
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-10-17 · Indy C 8.5W IRCD Thompson · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kessa McNaught
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-4
W
2026-10-04 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tamara Kafka
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-27 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Martin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-09-22 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martha Harker
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-20 · Indy C 7.5W IRCD Faulkenberg · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Linda Burwell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-16 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheri Faulkenberg
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mae Joubert
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Lindsey
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-16 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Barrett · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Grable
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
Default
2026-05-21 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Faulkenberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erica Curtiss
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
71.8%
28W–11L · 66.5% of games
3.5
84.9%
45W–8L · 67.4% of games
4.0
77.2%
44W–13L · 62.7% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 41.8% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 63% of games
7.5
72%
18W–7L · 61.1% of games
8.5
50%
3W–3L · 55% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
24 matches
#2 Singles
6%
13 matches
Singles
6%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King