← Search

Tracy Miller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Carmel, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 120W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history185 matches
L
2026-10-27 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Inselberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Chlystun
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-03 · Low Tri W IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Burns
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-27 · Low Tri W IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Burns
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-5
L
2026-08-13 · Low Tri W IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julie Burns
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-06 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Gupta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Collins
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-03 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Burns
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-27 · Indy A55 8.0W IRCD Gupta · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Burns
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Inselberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Chlystun
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-16 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Inselberg · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Li
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-5
W
Default
2026-07-16 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Gupta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jacqueline Bartelt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · Indy A18 4.0W IRCD Inselberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Andersen
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Inselberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Talpas
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
0%
0W–5L · 27.7% of games
3.5
85.1%
63W–11L · 64.8% of games
4.0
25%
11W–33L · 41.8% of games
6.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 67.8% of games
7.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 76.7% of games
7.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 51% of games
8.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.3% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 59.8% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
47 matches
#1 Singles
21%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
37 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer