← Search

KATHLEEN Michael

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fishers, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
220 matches · 132W–88L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history220 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Indy C 7.5W CRC Meyer · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Somer Compton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-27 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carmen Cudiamat
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-5, 1-0
L
2026-10-26 · Indy A40 3.5W MON IRCD Inselberg · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-10-18 · Indy C 7.5W CRC Meyer · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alice Walker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-29 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Gupta · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carmen Cudiamat
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-22 · Indy A40 4.0W TUE IRCD Gupta · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-20 · Indy C 7.5W CRC Meyer · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lora Meyer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-5
L
2026-09-14 · Indy A40 3.5W MON IRCD Inselberg · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Schreiner
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-29 · Indy X18 7.0 CRC Kim · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bob Slowikowski mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Dalton · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Coyne
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-06 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Dalton · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Coyne
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-27 · #1 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
80%
28W–7L · 67% of games
3.5
67.1%
49W–24L · 57.4% of games
4.0
25%
6W–18L · 40.9% of games
6.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.4% of games
6.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 66.7% of games
7.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 58% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 38% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
50%
8W–8L · 48.3% of games
7.0mixed
43.5%
10W–13L · 50.1% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
61 matches
#1 Singles
28%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
31 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe