← Search

Kriss Bowes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
246 matches · 97W–149L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history246 matches
W
2026-09-08 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Collins · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Hoskin
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-09-01 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Collins · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with MaryCatharine Grau
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-19 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Collins · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Nichole Salcedo
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-17 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Holden · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelly Owens
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-11 · Indy A65 6.0W IRCD Mowry · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Martha Jackson
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Holden · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelly Owens
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-06 · Indy A55 7.0W E PATC Ackerman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bonnie Sando
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-30 · Indy A55 7.0W E PATC Ackerman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chahrzad Montrose
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-23 · Indy A55 7.0W E PATC Ackerman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leyna Mulholland
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-21 · Indy A65 6.0W IRCD Mowry · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Haley Lawrence
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-5
L
2026-07-20 · Indy A40 3.5W IRCD Lieber-Hale · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Jackson
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-13 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Holden · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Kempsell
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
54.2%
39W–33L · 51.7% of games
3.5
28.6%
16W–40L · 41.6% of games
5.5
40%
2W–3L · 51.7% of games
6.0
41.9%
13W–18L · 48.5% of games
6.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 50.2% of games
7.0
35.1%
13W–24L · 39% of games
7.5
0%
0W–5L · 29.4% of games
6.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 39.5% of games
6.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.2% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 20.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
96 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
51 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
8 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer