← Search

Lisa Kempsell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 56W–102L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history158 matches
L
2026-10-26 · Indy A40 3.5W MON IRCD Holden · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley Holden
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nichole Salcedo championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-12 · Indy A40 3.5W MON IRCD Holden · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chenae Van Zee
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-28 · Indy A40 3.5W MON IRCD Holden · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Madia
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-01 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Holden · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Hughes
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-25 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Holden · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Madia
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-11 · Indy A65 6.0W IRCD Mowry · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Bennett
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Holden · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tamara Kafka
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Holden · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Emma Harmon
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-28 · Indy A65 6.0W IRCD Mowry · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Bennett
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-20 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Holden · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelley Holden
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
Default
2026-07-16 · Indy A40 3.0W IRCD Holden · #1 Singles · 3.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 66.1% of games
3.0
28.9%
28W–69L · 41.7% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 37.5% of games
5.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.9% of games
6.0
42.4%
14W–19L · 47.2% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
39 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer