← Search

Pamela Bennett

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 24W–110L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history134 matches
L
2026-10-27 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Gayle Jones
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-22 · Indy A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Todd
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-30 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Gayle Jones
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-24 · Indy A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Mayer
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-17 · Indy A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessey Mason
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-16 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Gayle Jones
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-01 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Baxter · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Graham
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · Indy A65 6.0W IRCD Mowry · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Hall
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-18 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Baxter · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Graham
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-11 · Indy A65 6.0W IRCD Mowry · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Kempsell
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-11 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Baxter · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Mayer
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-04 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Baxter · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Graham
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
25.8%
23W–66L · 37.9% of games
5.5
0%
0W–10L · 27.9% of games
6.0
4.2%
1W–23L · 29.9% of games
6.5
0%
0W–10L · 26.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
21 matches
#1 Singles
10%
13 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer