← Search

Christina Graham

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 33W–82L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history115 matches
L
2026-10-28 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sharon Baxter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-15 · Indy A40 3.0W IHP Clem · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie O'Connor
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-08 · Indy A40 3.0W IHP Clem · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Kutin
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-07 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kim Taylor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-03 · Indy C 6.5W IHP Clem · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emily Wright
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-09-30 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sandi Frizzell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-26 · Indy C 6.5W IHP Clem · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leyna Mulholland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-23 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sharon Baxter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-17 · Indy A40 3.0W IHP Clem · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Kutin
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-16 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kim Taylor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-09-02 · A18 3.5W GAP IHP Clem · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Clem
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-01 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Baxter · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Bennett
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
23.9%
17W–54L · 39.3% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 47.1% of games
6.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 48% of games
6.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 34.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
9 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
4 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams