← Search

Elizabeth Tysklind

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 41W–86L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history127 matches
L
2026-10-31 · Indy C 6.5W IHP Clem · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Bearby
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-22 · Indy A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Mayer
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-15 · Indy A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristi Shea
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-08 · Indy A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Brown
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-01 · Indy A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Mayer
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-10 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Donnelly · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Findling
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-05 · A18 3.5W GAP IHP Clem · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Clem
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-30 · Indy A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Graham
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-27 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Donnelly · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Findling
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-6
L
2026-07-20 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Donnelly · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nora MacEy
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-07 · Indy A18 3.0W IHP Clem · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bridget Hurry
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-06 · Indy A55 6.0W IRCD Donnelly · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Findling
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
30.2%
16W–37L · 41% of games
3.5
21.1%
4W–15L · 35% of games
5.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 41.7% of games
6.0
44.8%
13W–16L · 53.5% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
25 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert