← Search

Sharon Baxter

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
2.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
164 matches · 33W–131L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history164 matches
L
2026-10-28 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Christina Graham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-27 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kimberly Jacobs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-20 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Judy Bourquin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-07 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Bridget Hurry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-30 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Julie Dunscomb
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-24 · Indy A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Jacobs
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-23 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Christina Graham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-16 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michelle Witek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-08 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Taylor · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Mayer
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-01 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Taylor · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Jacobs
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-25 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Taylor · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Bourquin
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-18 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Taylor · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Mayer
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.9% of games
3.0
21.3%
19W–70L · 35.7% of games
3.5
8%
2W–23L · 27.6% of games
5.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 33.3% of games
6.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 45.6% of games
6.5
0%
0W–14L · 28.9% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
43 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe