← Search

Judy Bourquin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 24W–84L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history108 matches
L
2026-10-28 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michelle Witek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-27 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Julie Dunscomb
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-20 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sharon Baxter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-08 · Indy A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessey Mason
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-07 · Indy C 5.5W WIRC Bourquin · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kimberly Jacobs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-25 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Baxter · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Baxter
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-11 · A18 3.0W GAP IRCD Baxter · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Baxter
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-30 · Indy A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Bennett
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandi Frizzell
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · Indy A18 3.0W LNHS Taylor · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Linard
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-11 · Indy A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Mayer
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-08 · Indy A18 3.0W LNHS Taylor · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Haas
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
22.6%
19W–65L · 35.4% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
25%
2W–6L · 39.2% of games
6.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 36.4% of games
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 15.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal