← Search

Leyna Mulholland

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
234 matches · 104W–130L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history234 matches
L
2026-10-31 · Indy C 6.5W IHP Clem · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lan Nguyen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-24 · Indy C 6.5W IHP Clem · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lan Nguyen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-10 · Indy C 6.5W IHP Clem · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ellen Carpenter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-03 · Indy C 6.5W IHP Clem · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brit Curtis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-26 · Indy C 6.5W IHP Clem · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Graham
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-19 · Indy C 6.5W IHP Clem · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ellen Carpenter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-09 · A18 3.5W GAP IND Banister · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheongae Welch
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-02 · A18 3.5W GAP IND Banister · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorinne Banister
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-26 · A18 3.5W GAP IND Banister · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorinne Banister
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-5
W
2026-08-19 · A18 3.5W GAP IND Banister · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheongae Welch
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-08-13 · Indy A55 7.0W E PATC Ackerman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chahrzad Montrose
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · A18 3.5W GAP IND Banister · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorinne Banister
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
47.1%
41W–46L · 50.5% of games
4.0
28%
7W–18L · 38.5% of games
6.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.1% of games
7.0
47.8%
32W–35L · 47.9% of games
7.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 43.9% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 21.7% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 53% of games
7.5mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 42.7% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
94 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
89 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
41 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert