← Search

Elizabeth Todd

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 24W–76L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history100 matches
L
2026-10-22 · Indy A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Bennett
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-01 · Indy A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Linard
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-10 · CIN A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Bennett
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-06-19 · CIN A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Butler
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-5, 0-1
L
2025-06-12 · CIN A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Butler
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-29 · CIN A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Bennett
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-05-15 · CIN A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandi Frizzell
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-24 · CIN A40 3.0W WIRC Bourquin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jo Fowler
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-11 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.0 W, Bourquin (IHP) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jo Fowler
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-0, 0-1
L
2024-06-27 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.0 W, Bourquin (IHP) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Linard
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-20 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.0 W, Bourquin (IHP) · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Linard
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-06-06 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.0 W, Bourquin (IHP) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Linard
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
27.4%
20W–53L · 38.3% of games
3.5
16.7%
3W–15L · 24.7% of games
5.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
20%
1W–4L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
11 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
6 matches
Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal